The mosaic embryo: what it means for the doctor and the patient.

INTRODUCTION: Mosaic embryos are embryos that on preimplantation genetic analysis are found to be composed of euploid and aneuploid cells. Although most of these embryos do not implant when transferred into the uterus following IVF treatment, some may implant and are capable of giving rise to babies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: There is currently an increasing number of reports of live births following the transfer of mosaic embryos. Compared to euploid, mosaic embryos have lower implantation rates and higher rates of miscarriage, and occasionally aneuploid component persists. However, their outcome is better than that obtained after the transfer of embryos consisting entirely of aneuploid cells. After implantation, the ability to develop into a full-term pregnancy is influenced by the amount and type of chromosomal mosaicism present in a mosaic embryo. Nowadays many experts in the reproductive field consider mosaic transfers as an option when no euploid embryos are available. Genetic counseling is an important part of educating patients about the likelihood of having a pregnancy with healthy baby but also on the risk that mosaicism could persist and result in liveborn with chromosomal abnormality. Each situation needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and counseled accordingly. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: So far, the transfers of 2155 mosaic embryos have been documented and 440 live births resulting in healthy babies have been reported. In addition, in the literature to date, there are 6 cases in which embryonic mosaicism persisted. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the available data indicate that mosaic embryos have the potential to implant and develop into healthy babies, albeit with lower success rates than euploids. Further clinical outcomes should be collected to better establish a refined ranking of embryos to transfer.

PGT-M, a Useful Tool to Manage the Lynch Syndrome Transmission.

Lynch syndrome is one of the most common hereditary cancer sensitivity syndromes and is caused by autosomal-dominant germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. In patients affected by this syndrome, pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) could be the elective technique used to prevent the transmission of this hereditary syndrome to offspring. Notably, despite the severity of the condition, some authors have observed a markedly lower demand for PGT-M in these patients compared to those with other hereditary conditions. A 34-year-old woman with a medical history of Lynch syndrome associated with endometrial cancer came to the Villa Mafalda fertility center in Rome in order to conceive a healthy baby. In a pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) + PGT-M cycle, eight blastocysts were formed. Six out of eight blastocysts were affected by the same mother syndrome. One of the other two was aneuploid and the other one was a mosaic embryo, which resulted in a healthy pregnancy. The aim of this report is to emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with this condition. In vitro fertilization (IVF), specifically PGT-M, is a tool that allow patients to conceive biological children with lower risk of inheriting the disease.

Chromosomal, gestational, and neonatal outcomes of embryos classified as a mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the clinical risks associated with the transfer of embryos classified as a mosaic using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. DESIGN: Analysis of data collected between 2017 and 2023. SETTING: Multicenter. PATIENTS: Patients of infertility treatment. INTERVENTION: Comparison of pregnancies resulting from embryos classified as euploid or mosaic using the 20%-80% interval in chromosomal intermediate copy numbers to define a mosaic result. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of spontaneous abortion, birth weight, length of gestation, incidence of birth defects, and chromosomal status during gestation. RESULTS: Implanted euploid embryos had a significantly lower risk of spontaneous abortion compared with mosaic embryos (8.9% [n = 8,672; 95% confidence interval {CI95} 8.3, 9.5] vs. 22.2% [n = 914; CI95 19.6, 25.0]). Embryos with mosaicism affecting whole chromosomes (not segmental) had the highest risk of spontaneous abortion (27.6% [n = 395; CI95 23.2, 32.3]). Infants born from euploid, mosaic, and whole chromosome mosaic embryos had average birth weights and lengths of gestation that were not statistically different (3,118 g and 267 days [n = 488; CI95 3,067, 3,169, and 266, 268], 3052 g and 265 days [n = 488; CI95 2,993, 3,112, and 264,267], 3,159 g and 268 days [n = 194; CI95 3,070, 3,249, and 266,270], respectively). Out of 488 infants from mosaic embryo transfers (ETs), one had overt gross abnormalities as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most prenatal tests performed on pregnancies from mosaic ETs had normal results, and only three pregnancies produced prenatal test results reflecting the mosaicism detected at the embryonic stage (3 out of 250, 1.2%; CI95 0.25, 3.5). CONCLUSION: Although embryos classified as mosaic experience higher rates of miscarriage than euploid embryos (with a particularly high frequency shortly after implantation), infants born of mosaic ETs are similar to infants of euploid ETs. Prenatal testing indicates that mosaicism resolves during most pregnancies, although this process is not perfectly efficient. In a small percentage of cases, the mosaicism persists through gestation. These findings can serve as risk-benefit considerations for mosaic ETs in the fertility clinic.

Two clinical case reports of embryonic mosaicism identified with PGT-A persisting during pregnancy as true fetal mosaicism.

The health risks associated with transferring embryos classified as mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) are currently unknown. Such embryos produce PGT-A results indicating the presence of both euploid and aneuploid cells and have historically been deselected from transfer and grouped with uniformly aneuploid embryos as 'abnormal'. In recent years, numerous groups have reported the intentional transfer of mosaic embryos in the absence of uniformly euploid embryos, largely observing births of seemingly healthy babies. However, it remains to be understood whether the embryonic mosaicism invariably becomes resolved during the ensuing pregnancy, or whether the placenta and/or fetal tissues retain aneuploid cells, and if so to what potential clinical effect. Here, we report two cases of mosaicism persisting from the embryonic stage to the established pregnancy. Case 1 involved an embryonic low-level segmental mosaic loss in Chromosome (Chr) 1, which was confirmed in amniocentesis as well as in brain tissue of the products of conception. This pregnancy was terminated due to the chromosomal pathologies associated with 1p36 deletion syndrome, such as severe intellectual disability. Case 2 involved a low-level mosaic Chr 21 trisomy, which was confirmed with chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The ensuing pregnancy was terminated after ultrasound identification of severe abnormalities in the placenta and fetus. Together, these two cases should be taken into account for risk-benefit assessments of prospective mosaic embryo transfers.

Twelve years of assessing the quality of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Genomics Quality Assessment has provided external quality assessments (EQAs) for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for 12 years for eight monogenic diseases to identify sub-optimal PGT strategies, testing and reporting of results, which can be shared with the genomics community to aid optimised standards of PGT services for couples. METHOD: The EQAs were provided in two stages to mimic end-to-end protocols. Stage 1 involved DNA feasibility testing of a couple undergoing PGT and affected proband. Participants were required to report genotyping results and outline their embryo testing strategy. Lymphoblasts were distributed for mock embryo testing for stage 2. Submitted clinical reports and haplotyping results were assessed against peer-ratified criteria. Performance was monitored to identify poor performance. RESULTS: The most common testing methodology was short tandem repeat linkage analysis (59%); however, the adoption of single nucleotide polymorphism-based platforms was observed and a move from blastomere to trophectoderm testing. There was a variation in testing strategies, assigning marker informativity and understanding test limitations, some clinically unsafe. Critical errors were reported for genotyping and interpretation. CONCLUSION: EQA provides an overview of the standard of preimplantation genetic testing-M clinical testing and identifies areas of improvement for accurate detection of high-risk embryos.

Cross-Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies for Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism and Segmental Aneuploidies in Preimplantation Embryos Model.

Detection of mosaic embryos is crucial to offer more possibilities of success to women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing are increasingly used for this purpose since their higher capability to detect chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos. In the recent years, new NGS systems were released, however their performance for chromosomal mosaicism are variable. We performed a cross-validation analysis of two different NGS platforms in order to assess the feasibility of these techniques and provide standard parameters for the detection of such aneuploidies. The study evaluated the performance of MiseqTM Veriseq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine PGMTM ReproSeq (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) for the detection of whole and segmental mosaic aneuploidies. Reconstructed samples with known percentage of mosaicism were analyzed with both platforms and sensitivity and specificity were determined. Both platforms had high level of specificity and sensitivity with a Limit Of Detection (LOD) at ≥30% of mosaicism and a showed a ≥5.0 Mb resolution for segmental abnormalities. Our findings demonstrated that NGS methodologies are capable of accurately detecting chromosomal mosaicism and segmental aneuploidies. The knowledge of LOD for each NGS platform has the potential to reduce false-negative and false-positive diagnoses when applied to detect chromosomal mosaicism in a clinical setting.

Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the extent of chromosomal mosaicism can influence the success rate of IVF treatments. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Private genetic and assisted reproduction centers. PATIENT(S): The transfer of mosaic embryos was offered to 77 women for which IVF resulted in no euploid embryos available for transfer. INTERVENTION(S): All embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage; trophectoderm biopsy was performed on day 5/6 of development. Comprehensive chromosome screening was performed using either next-generation sequencing or array-comparative genomic hybridization methodologies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The clinical outcome obtained after transfer of mosaic embryos with low (<50%) and high (≥50%) aneuploidy percentage was compared with that resulting from a control group of 251 euploid blastocysts. RESULT(S): A significantly higher implantation rate (48.9% vs. 24.2%), clinical pregnancy rate/ET (40.9% vs. 15.2%), and live-birth rate (42.2% vs. 15.2%) were observed comparing embryos with mosaicism <50% and ≥50%. Mosaic embryos with high aneuploidy percentage (≥50%) showed a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate/ET (15.2% vs. 46.4%), implantation rate (24.4% vs. 54.6%), and live-birth rate (15.2% vs. 46.6%) than euploid blastocysts. In contrast, embryos with lower aneuploidy percentage (<50%) have a clinical outcome similar to euploid embryos. CONCLUSION(S): The results of this study further confirm that mosaic embryos can develop into healthy euploid newborns. We demonstrated that the extent of mosaicism influences the IVF success rate. Mosaic embryos with low aneuploidy percentage have higher chances of resulting in the birth of healthy babies compared with embryos with higher mosaicism levels.

Genetic diseases and aneuploidies can be detected with a single blastocyst biopsy: a successful clinical approach.

STUDY QUESTION: Can simultaneous detection of aneuploidies and genetic diseases or chromosomal aberrations in blastocysts reduce the chance of transferring embryos with low implantation potential, guaranteeing good clinical outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: The screening for chromosomal aneuploidies revealed that 50.6% of blastocysts diagnosed free of genetic disease or balanced, were aneuploid, therefore avoiding the transfer of blastocysts potentially resulting in implantation failures, miscarriages, or in some cases, in health affected live births. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PGD is applied in patients at risk of transmitting genetically inheritable diseases to their offspring. It has been demonstrated that aneuploidies can involve chromosomes other than those investigated with PGD, affecting embryo implantation competence. Performing the biopsy at blastocyst level produces higher clinical outcomes allowing a more accurate diagnosis, compared to blastomere biopsy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This consecutive case series study was performed from October 2011 to May 2016. Clinical and biological outcomes from 1122 blastocysts obtained in 304 PGD cycles for monogenic diseases (N = 163) or chromosomal rearrangements (N = 141) were analyzed. When the blastocyst resulted transferable after the PGD analysis or chromosomal rearrangement analysis, its ploidy status by mean of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) was also detected using the same biopsy sample. Mean female age was 35.4 ± 4.2 years old. All biopsies were performed at blastocyst stage and analyzed by Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) followed by PCR for monogenic diseases, and by array-comparative genotype hybridization (array-CGH) for all cycles. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: All mature oocytes retrieved were injected and cultured individually until the blastocyst stage at 37°C, 6% CO2, 5% O2. When the blastocyst was formed, it was biopsied and vitrified, awaiting the genetic results. The frozen-thawed embryo transfer was performed in a subsequent cycle. In some cases, when the blastocyst was obtained within the morning of Day 5 of culture, it had been maintained in culture and transferred on Day 6, after receiving the genetic report. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 2809 (2718 fresh and 91 frozen-thawed) mature oocytes were injected with a fertilization rate of 75.5% (N = 2120), leading to the development of 2102 embryos. A further 24 frozen embryos, previously vitrified without any genetic testing, were successfully warmed for genetic screening. A total of 2126 embryos were cultured with a blastocyst formation rate of 52.8% (N = 1122); all of them were biopsied from Day 4 to Day 7 of culture. After the genetic analysis, 309 (27.5%) blastocysts resulted transferable, both for monogenic disease or translocation and for their ploidy status, 42 were diploid/aneuploid mosaic, 55 were no result and 716 were not transferable, due to genetic disease or chromosomal rearrangement and/or for their ploidy status. Of note, 316 (50.6% of transferable blastocysts after PGD and 28.2% of total number of biopsied blastocysts) of the blastocysts resulted healthy for the genetic disease or chromosomal rearrangement were aneuploid. Out of 304 PGD/PGS cycles performed, 28.6% (N = 87) resulted in no-transferable blastocysts after only PGD analysis; this percentage increased to 39.8% (N = 121) when also PGS was carried out (Mc Nemar test P < 0.001). A total of 202 embryo-transfers were performed, 53 fresh and 149 cryopreserved, in which 218 healthy or carrier euploid blastocysts were transferred. Clinical pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates were 49.0, 47.7 and 9.9%, respectively. To date, 66 deliveries occurred with 70 healthy babies born and 13 pregnancies are still ongoing. Finally, 91 euploid healthy blastocysts are still cryopreserved waiting to be transferred. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A higher than expected cycle cancellation rate could be found due to the double genetic analysis performed. For this reason, particular care should be taken in drafting and explaining informed consent, in order to avoid patient drop out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: When the biopsy has to be performed in order to prevent the transmission of an inheritable disease, it should be mandatory to analyze also the genetic status of the blastocyst, avoiding useless embryo-transfers in this particular category of patients. In our study, 316 aneuploid healthy blastocysts could have been transferred without performing PGS, leading to implantation failures, miscarriages, or in some cases, to live births affected by different syndromes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst.

INTRODUCTION: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and/or screening (PGD/PGS) allow the assessment of the genetic health of an embryo before transferring it into the uterus. These techniques require the removal of cellular material (polar bodies, blastomere(s) or trophectoderm cells) in order to perform the proper genetic analysis. We report the implantation and live birth outcome of a vitrified-warmed blastocyst developed after triple biopsy and double vitrification procedures at oocyte, cleavage embryo and blastocyst stage. CASE DESCRIPTION: An infertile couple, with family history of ß-thalassemia, searched for IVF procedure and PGD. First polar bodies biopsy with subsequent vitrification was uninformative due to meiotic crossing-over, so oocytes were inseminated after warming. Two embryos were obtained and blastomere biopsy was performed on day 3 with inconclusive results on their genetic status. Their culture resulted in one expanded blastocyst stage on day 7 that underwent trophectoderm biopsy and vitrification. This embryo showed to be normal. It was then warmed and transferred in an artificial cycle. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Preconception genetic analysis by removal and analysis of the first polar body is technically possible, but the genetic information that we can obtain at this stage may be limited and the oocytes to be inseminated is not predictable. Compared to blastomere biopsy, trophectoderm biopsy has more diagnostic efficiency with respect to both chromosomal mosaicism and PCR accuracy, reducing the problems of amplification failure and allele drop out. Moreover, embryos biopsied at the cleavage stage seem to have lower implantation rate than biopsied blastocyst. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case report of a live birth obtained from a three step biopsy and double vitrification procedures of a blastocyst. This case report seems also to suggest the harmlessness of all these procedures if carefully performed by a skilled biologist in an IVF lab with quality management system. Finally, our study highlight that blastocyst cryopreserved on day 7 have clinically important potential and embryos that not reach blastocyst stage on day 6 should not to be discharged because they may result in an ongoing pregnancy.

Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Can next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques be used reliably for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of human embryos from patients undergoing IVF treatments, with the purpose of identifying and selecting chromosomally normal embryos for transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Extensive application of NGS in clinical preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) cycles demonstrates that this methodology is reliable, allowing identification and transfer of euploid embryos resulting in ongoing pregnancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The effectiveness of PGS is dependent upon the biology of the early embryo and the limitations of the technology. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, used to test for a few chromosomes, has largely been superseded by microarray techniques that test all 24 chromosomes. Array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) has been demonstrated to be an accurate PGS method and has become the de facto gold standard, but new techniques, such as NGS, continue to emerge. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study consisted of a prospective trial involving a double blind parallel evaluation, with both NGS and array-CGH techniques, of 192 blastocysts obtained from 55 consecutive clinical PGS cycles undertaken during the period of September to October 2013. Consistency of NGS-based aneuploidy detection was assessed by matching the results obtained with array-CGH-based diagnoses. Primary outcome measure was accuracy of the chromosomal analysis; secondary outcome measures were clinical outcomes. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: Fifty-five patients (median age 39.3 years, range 32-46) undergoing PGS were enrolled in the study. All embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage; trophectoderm biopsy was performed on Day 5 of development or Day 6/7 for slower growing embryos. The method involved whole genome amplification followed by both NGS and array-CGH. The MiSeq control software, real-time analysis and reporter performed on-board primary and secondary bioinformatics analysis. Copy number variation analysis was accomplished with BlueFuse Multi software. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 192 blastocysts were blindly evaluated with the NGS-based protocol. Paired comparison between NGS and array-CGH from individual embryos showed concordant results in 191/192 (99.5%) of the blastocysts tested. In total 4608 chromosomes were assessed, 211 (4.6%) of which carried a copy number imbalance. NGS specificity for aneuploidy calling (consistency of chromosome copy number assignment) was 99.98% (4333/4334; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 99.87-100) with a sensitivity of 100% (211/211, 95% CI: 99.25-100). Despite one discordant result, NGS specificity and sensitivity for aneuploid embryo calling (24-chromosome diagnosis consistency) were both 100% since the discordant sample presented several other aneuploidies. Clinical application of the NGS-based approach revealed 74/192 (38.5%) euploid blastocysts. Following transfer of 50 embryos in 47 women, 34 women had positive hCG levels: 30 pregnancies continued, confirmed by at least one fetal sac and heart beat (63.8% clinical pregnancy rate/embryo transfer), 3 were biochemical and 1 miscarried. A total of 32 embryos implanted and led to the presence of a fetal sac (64.0% implantation rate). All pregnancies went to term resulting in the birth of 31 healthy babies. LIMITATION, REASON FOR CAUTION: Although clinical results reported high pregnancy outcomes following transfer of screened embryos, further data and broad-based clinical application are required to better define the role of NGS in PGS. Before recommending widespread application, a randomized controlled trial confirming its clinical effectiveness is advisable. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDING: This is the first study reporting extensive application of NGS-based comprehensive aneuploidy screening on embryos at blastocyst stage in a clinical setting versus array-CGH as test of reference. NGS has demonstrated a reliable methodology, with the potential to improve chromosomal diagnosis on embryos especially in terms of high-throughput, automation and ability to detect aneuploidy. NGS methodology may represent a valuable alternative to the other comprehensive aneuploidy screening techniques currently available. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was sought for this study. Drs F.K. and C.-E.M. are full-time employees of Illumina, Inc., which provided NGS library and sequencing reagents for the study. All other authors have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Comparative genomic hybridization selection of blastocysts for repeated implantation failure treatment: a pilot study.

The aim of this study is to determine if the use of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) by array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) and transfer of a single euploid blastocyst in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) can improve clinical results. Three patient groups are compared: 43 couples with RIF for whom embryos were selected by array CGH (group RIF-PGS), 33 couples with the same history for whom array CGH was not performed (group RIF NO PGS), and 45 good prognosis infertile couples with array CGH selected embryos (group NO RIF PGS). A single euploid blastocyst was transferred in groups RIF-PGS and NO RIF PGS. Array CGH was not performed in group RIF NO PGS in which 1-2 blastocysts were transferred. One monoembryonic sac with heartbeat was found in 28 patients of group RIF PGS and 31 patients of group NO RIF PGS showing similar clinical pregnancy and implantation rates (68.3% and 70.5%, resp.). In contrast, an embryonic sac with heartbeat was only detected in 7 (21.2%) patients of group RIF NO PGS. In conclusion, PGS by array CGH with single euploid blastocyst transfer appears to be a successful strategy for patients with multiple failed IVF attempts.

Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening and to investigate its applicability to preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). DESIGN: Retrospective blinded study. SETTING: Reference laboratory. PATIENT(S): Karyotypically defined chromosomally abnormal single cells and whole-genome amplification (WGA) products, previously analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH), selected from 68 clinical PGS cycles with embryos biopsied at cleavage stage. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Consistency of NGS-based diagnosis of aneuploidy compared with either conventional karyotyping of single cells or array-CGH diagnoses of single blastomeres. RESULT(S): Eighteen single cells and 190 WGA products from single blastomeres, were blindly evaluated with the NGS-based protocol. In total, 4,992 chromosomes were assessed, 402 of which carried a copy number imbalance. NGS specificity for aneuploidy call (consistency of chromosome copy number assignment) was 99.98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.88%-100%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99.08%-100%). NGS specificity for aneuploid embryo call (24-chromosome diagnosis consistency) was 100% (95% CI 94.59%-100%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 97.39%-100%). CONCLUSION(S): This is the first study reporting extensive preclinical validation and accuracy assessment of NGS-based comprehensive aneuploidy screening on single cells. Given the high level of consistency with an established methodology, such as array-CGH, NGS has demonstrated a robust high-throughput methodology ready for clinical application in reproductive medicine, with potential advantages of reduced costs and enhanced precision.

Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the optimal stage from oocyte through preimplantation embryo development for biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to detect abnormal chromosome segregation patterns in eggs or embryos from advanced maternal age (AMA) patients? SUMMARY ANSWER: Testing at the polar body (PB) stage was the least accurate mainly due to the high incidence of post-zygotic events. This suggests that postponing the time of biopsy to the blastocyst stage of preimplantation embryo development may provide the most reliable results for PGS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In the PGS field there is an ongoing debate about the optimal biopsy stage for PGS. This is a result of the lack of understanding of how aneuploidy arises in the human embryo. To date, most of the cytogenetic data obtained during PGS investigations have been derived through the analysis of cells at isolated points in the preimplantation window, thus potentially missing critical information on chromosomal segregation. Understanding the chromosome segregation patterns during preimplantation development holds the potential to significantly increase the success rates of IVF. In this study, a sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis of both the PBs and the corresponding embryos at both the cleavage and the blastocyst stages is presented. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study performed between October 2009 and August 2011 involving 9 infertile couples and 21 sets of complete comprehensive chromosomal screening data, including PB1, PB2, corresponding blastomeres and trophectoderm (TE) samples. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples undergoing IVF cycles with PGS where the female partner was older than 40 years and with a good response to controlled ovarian stimulation (>10 MII oocytes retrieved) were enrolled into the study. The exclusion criteria were (i) patients presenting with abnormal karyotype; (ii) specific ovarian pathologies including polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis grade III or higher and premature ovarian failure and (iii) severe male factor infertility (motile sperm count of <500 000/ml after preparation of a fresh ejaculate). The PBs, blastomere and TE samples were sequentially biopsied and analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The analysis of chromosome segregation patterns was performed to infer the origin of aneuploidy and to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of both PB and cleavage-stage PGS strategies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Twenty-one sets of complete data (PB1/PB2/blastomere/TE) including 84 aCGH experiments showed a pattern of multiple meiotic errors typically caused by sister chromatid separation errors and predominantly arising in the second meiotic division. Twenty-two of the 24 (91.7%) errors in the first meiotic division arose as a consequence of premature sister chromatid predivision. In half of these cases, the second meiotic division resulted in a balancing chromosome segregation event producing a normal female complement for that chromosome in the resulting embryo. Overall, only 62 out of 78 (79.5%) of the abnormal meiotic segregations had errors in the either one or both PBs consistent with the aneuploidies observed in their resulting embryos. Ten of the 21 (47.6%) embryos had aneuploidies other than female meiotic-derived ones, most of which detected on Day 3 and confirmed on Day 5 or 6 of embryo development (20/25) with chromosomal loss being three times more frequent than gains. Notably, as high as 20% of female-derived aneuploidies detected on PBs and confirmed on Day 3 were rescued at the blastocyst stage, mainly as a result of diploidization of trisomic chromosomes. On a per chromosome basis, the sensitivity in predicting blastocyst chromosomal complement was significantly lower for PB approach, 61.7%, compared with blastomeres analysis, 86.4% (P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was limited to the analysis of oocytes and embryos from AMA patients. Thus, these findings apply only to this patient group. Comparisons with other patient populations including patients with different indications for PGS should be made in future research. In addition, higher resolution and/or more accurate chromosomal screening tests could be used in future studies to corroborate the current findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These findings provide critical insights into the mechanisms causing errors during female meiosis and the preimplantation embryo development period to improve the design and treatment outcome of PGS.

The experience of 3 years of external quality assessment of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was first performed over 20 years ago and has become an accepted part of genetic testing and assisted reproduction worldwide. The techniques and protocols necessary to carry out genetic testing at the single-cell level can be difficult to master and have been developed independently by the laboratories worldwide offering preimplantation testing. These factors indicated the need for an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for monogenic disease PGD. Toward this end, the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology came together with United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Services for Molecular Genetics, to create a pilot EQA scheme followed by practical EQA schemes for all interested parties. Here, we detail the development of the pilot scheme as well as development and findings from the practical (clinical) schemes that have followed. Results were generally acceptable and there was marked improvement in results and laboratory scores for those labs that participated in multiple schemes. Data from the first three schemes indicate that the EQA scheme is working as planned and has helped laboratories improve their techniques and result reporting. The EQA scheme for monogenic PGD will continue to be developed to offer assessment for other monogenic disorders.

Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of offering array-based comparative genomic hybridization testing for prenatal diagnosis as a first-line test, a prospective study was performed, comparing the results achieved from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) with those obtained from conventional karyotype. METHOD: Women undergoing amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling were offered aCGH analysis. A total of 1037 prenatal samples were processed in parallel using both aCGH and G-banding for standard karyotyping. Specimen types included amniotic fluid (89.0%), chorionic villus sampling (9.5%) and cultured amniocytes (1.5%). RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 34 (3.3%) samples; in 9 out of 34 cases (26.5%) aCGH detected pathogenic copy number variations that would not have been found if only a standard karyotype had been performed. aCGH was also able to detect chromosomal mosaicism at as low as a 10% level. There was complete concordance between the conventional karyotyping and aCGH results, except for 2 cases that were only correctly diagnosed by aCGH. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that aCGH represents an improved diagnostic tool for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Although larger studies are needed, our results provide further evidence on the feasibility of introducing aCGH as a first-line diagnostic test in routine prenatal diagnosis practice.

Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of chromosomal imbalances on embryos: the evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) approach for detection of chromosomal imbalances in embryos. DESIGN: A prospective study of embryos derived from chromosome translocation carriers that have undergone PGD using a novel molecular-based approach. SETTING: A reference molecular genetics laboratory specialized in the provision of transport PGD services and a private IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): Twenty-seven couples carrying 12 different reciprocal translocations and 2 Robertsonian translocations. INTERVENTION(S): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis from chromosome translocation carriers on blastomeres biopsied from cleavage stage embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo diagnosis rate, pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate, take-home-baby rate. RESULT(S): Overall, 241/251 (96.0%) embryos were successfully diagnosed for chromosome rearrangements. Preimplantation genetic screening was included in the protocol of 12 couples, involving analysis of 90 embryos, 84 (93.3%) of which were successfully diagnosed and 53 (63.1%) showed aneuploidies. Embryos suitable for transfer were identified in 24 cycles. Eighteen couples achieved a clinical pregnancy (75.0% PR/embryo transfer), with a total of 31 embryos implanted (59.6% implantation rate). Ten patients (1 triplet, 1 twin, and 8 singleton pregnancies) have delivered 13 healthy babies, and the other patients (3 twins and 5 singletons) have currently ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION(S): The PCR-based PGD protocol for translocations has the potential to overcome several inherent limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization-based tests, providing potential improvements in terms of test performance, automation, turnaround time, sensitivity, and reliability.

Short tandem repeats haplotyping of the HLA region in preimplantation HLA matching.

Recently, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been considered for several indications beyond its original purpose, not only to test embryos for genetic disease but also to select embryos for a nondisease trait, such as specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes, related to immune compatibility with an existing affected child in need of a haematopoetic stem cell (HSC) transplant. We have optimized an indirect single-cell HLA typing protocol based on a multiplex fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of short tandem repeat (STR) markers scattered throughout the HLA complex. The assay was clinically applied in 60 cycles from 45 couples. A conclusive HLA-matching diagnosis was achieved in 483/530 (91.1%) of the embryos tested. In total, 74 (15.3%) embryos revealed an HLA match with the affected siblings, 55 (11.4%) of which resulted unaffected and 46 (9.5%) have been transferred to the patients. Nine pregnancies were achieved, five healthy HLA-matched children have already been delivered and cord blood HSCs, were transplanted to three affected siblings, resulting in a successful haematopoietic reconstruction.

Effect of BCG vaccination on cytokine mRNA expression in atopic children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether a preexisting T(H2)-type immune response could be suppressed by BCG immunization in atopic children with asthma. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have used PCR to amplify reverse transcribed (RT) IFN-gamma and IL-5 mRNA expressed by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in response to in vitro phytohemagglutinin A, purified protein derivative and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus II stimulation from nine atopic children, both before and 8 weeks after BCG vaccination. We have demonstrated that IFN-gamma expression was induced in response to all stimulants (IFN-gamma/beta-actin) after the vaccination, whereas there was no expression before (P<0.001). Although there was a tendency to diminish in the expression of IL-5 mRNA in response to the stimulants, only PHA rendered a statistically significant decrease after the vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide some evidence of TH1 dominance after BCG administration in atopic children.